Friday, September 6, 2013

Syrian Rebels Destruction of Maaloula Should be a Clear Line in the Sand

Terrorists targeting Maaloula should be a line in the sand, not the Assad regime that has been trying to defend/protect its inhabitants


Maaloula is a Christendom treasure. Specifically, it is one of three villages where the inhabitants speak Aramaic (the ancient language Jesus also spoke). Due to its mountainous isolated location, the mostly Christian (Orthodox) inhabitants of Maaloula have managed to hold onto their culture and language. It is the site of ancient Christian monasteries -Mar Taqla and Mar Sarkis-- that have withstood the Muslim conquest of the region. It is a mystical/magical place.



In October of 1991, I wandered Syria. From Dimashq to Halab (Aleppo) and many towns and villages in between (like Hama, Homs,Tartus and Maaloula), and the last Crusader stronghold to fall in 1302 AD on the island of Arwad/Ruad. Days and nights spent with local Syrians in public places, and in their homes. A highly intelligent and civilized Arab/Levantine people, who impressed me with their frankness, kindness and hospitality.


The original plan had been to take a bus trip from Dimashq north to Istanbul and back to Dimashq. But the Syrian Embassy in Islamabad was adamant: They refused to issue a multiple entry visa on my American passport. It was in and out of Dimashq or nothing. And the female Lebanese Ambassador informed me that they were prohibited from issuing a visa to Americans due to safety concerns. So taking a day trip to Beirut via taxi was also out. It was to be an "in and out" trip although I could stay awhile.


When I arrived at the Dimashq airport and took a taxi into the city, the initial plan was to spend some nights at a place run by nuns in the old city, before heading north. It was here that I "bumped" into Siham in the front lawn after I'd checked in and headed out to explore the old city.

Siham (I won't disclose her last name) was one of very few Syrians who spoke English fairly well. She was an attractive, intelligent young woman of x years (according to her Govt issued ID). We were intended to become "best buddies" while I roamed the country (often with her, her brother and some friends -Muslim & Christian). 


Did manage to take a solo trip via bus to Halab/Aleppo,and stayed in the famous --though somewhat dilapidated due to the ravages of time--Baron's Hotel still run by a distinguished Armenian family. The patriarch in his mid-80s was proud to kindly provide me with photocopies of Agatha Christie, as well as T.E. Lawrence's, hotel bills. 

Back to Siham. She's Christian whose mother tongue is Aramaic. Her family has lived in Maaloula since .....well forever. Siham, unbeknownst to her, provided a fascinating insight of daily life in Syria from a  Syrian Christian female's prism . 


Her views and insights will remain confidential, but they served to reinforce some deep seated concerns vis-a-vis interfaith relations in the region. Had she known I was a Muslim (rather than another secular American--she never asked me about my faith), I doubt she would have been so candid. I acknowledged her concerns, although they saddened me: centuries of religious persecution and hate have cultivated masked personas in order to survive/thrive. Siham's deep seated fears became apparent during an incident in the Ummayyad Mosque in Dimashq.


Today, I'm worried about Siham and her wonderful extended family who made me --a complete stranger--feel so welcome in their Maaloula home. We lost touch after a few letters and this was before the advent of email. The Christian community in Maaloula was different. These were peaceful people who hated violence and just wanted to be left alone to cultivate their faith. 


The fact that the Obama administration has been clandestinely supplying some Syrian thugs/beasts (and increasingly/ predominantly foreign jihadis, many dislodged from Saudi and other Arab prisons) with weaponry paid for by American tax payers to kill Christians, Kurds, secular Sunnis, Alawites (a moderate Muslim sect who experienced horrific persecution at the hands of Sunnis and Shia throughout history; as did the Druze) is mind boggling. It is insane, unless Al Qaeda et al have indeed managed to hijack our foreign policy via proxies. 


This is the first time in my life --since I psychologically/culturally became an American-- that I'm ashamed of my country. Specifically, it is the elitist/Washington beltway agenda that sickens. How so many can willingly sell their souls (and their nation's best interests) for short term rewards is disconcerting, to put it mildly.


But after the horrific attack on 9/11, to have Washington (both political parties) capitulate and bend over for forces of evil and their paymasters/puppeteers is like a nightmare that never ends. Surreal. Scary. And, absolutely unnecessary. Sure, if one could peel away the layers, the malevolent motives behind such policy would reveal themselves. But most of us --average Americans-- aren't privy to the machinations of those in power. 


This isn't going to end well. This century is going to make the last one look downright benign, notwithstanding two World Wars, if we continue on this insane trajectory.


Below is an article on Maaloula. Where is the pope*, the head of the Orthodox Christian Church, Muslim rulers and ulema (who defend the religion of peace 24/7)? Their silence is criminal. 
*Update: The Pope --although not head of the Greek Orthodox or Melkaite Church-- has put aside the ancient schism between Byzantine and Rome to issue a statement against war as the antidote to the current violence. This is a good move at a time when politicians mislead their populaces on the volatility of this civil war.


The Telegraph

By Beirut and Magdy Samaan




A branch of al-Qaeda fighting in the Syrian civil war has seized one of the few remaining villages where the original language of Christ is still spoken, residents say.

"First they took a brick factory owned by a Christian guy, who is now missing," said the resident. "Then at around 5.30am, a car bomb detonated at the checkpoint at the entrance to the village.
"Some of the rebels entered a home near the checkpoint belonging to Yousef Haddad, a Christian. They tried to force him to convert to Islam."
A nun living in a convent in the village told the Associated press that 27 orphans living in the convent were taken to nearby caves for shelter.
Video footage posted on YouTube showed rebel fighters on a pick up truck with an anti-aircraft gun mounted on the back firing erratically from inside the mountain town.
Christians, who make up approximately 10 per cent of Syria's population, have increasingly become targets in the conflict as sectarian-minded foreign jihadists gain influence in the opposition ranks. Almost a third of the Syriac Christian population has fled the rebel-held northern town of Hassakeh after Christians became targets for kidnappings and assassinations.



Wednesday, September 4, 2013

Dr. Laila Khan, Talented New Pushtun Female Singer




                                      













                                                 

Tuesday, August 27, 2013

A Western Military Intervention in Syria = Support for the Muslim Brotherhood & its Various Offshoots

Syria & Use of Chemical Weapons: 

The ongoing debate in the West (whether chemical weapons were used & who used them?) to determine some sort of intervention/response from the West (US & UK govts primarily gunning for action against the Assad regime) is dangerously short sighted on so many levels, and reflects a lack of nuance and long term strategic thinking on the outcome (thanks to some sort of initial limited military response) which will, in all likelihood, lead to the deaths of more Syrian civilians caught between the devil and the deep blue sea. And, destabilize the Levant and beyond.

If the Assad regime collapses, the blood bath of Christians, Kurds, Alawites and secular Sunnis will be extensive. Not to mention the likely spillover effect for Israel, Jordan and Lebanon. States that can't afford such a state of affairs next door. In short, removal of Assad's regime (however brutal and corrupt) will only ensure either the end of the Syrian state and/or a civil war reminiscent of Lebanon's (1975-1990).

Does the Assad regime have a precedent (on using chemical weapons)? Yes, Hafiz Assad, the father, did indeed resort to use of chemical weapons in the tunnels of Hama in '82. The details of what happened in Hama (the Syrian MB headquarters) during those two weeks are far more gruesome than reported by Amnesty International. Around 45,000 were killed and Hama's downtown was left in rubble. At that time the Syrian MB, emboldened by Sadat's successful assassination by their Egyptian Brothers in Cairo in '81, were resorting to vicious tactics across Syria and even Damascus was under siege. The MB's brutal assaults (civilians, military family quarters etc etc) on civil society necessitated stringent/violent counter measures, although one can never condone the use of chemical weapons for any reason. No foreign leaders outside Syria batted an eye and some called it "an internal affair." 

The reality is that the Hama offensive basically eliminated the  MB menace from Syria for almost three decades...until they reemerged thanks to the "Arab Spring."

By launching missiles upon Syrian targets we would, in effect, be announcing to the Syrian people and beyond, that we (US/UK et al) stand by the MB and their political/religious ethos (just read Banna, Qutb to comprehend the depths of their contempt and hate for Western Civilization) and for what they designate as "jahilliyah" near enemy.


In short, our foreign policy vis-a-vis Egypt and Syria announces to Jordan, Morocco, UAE, Kuwait, Algeria, Yemen, Oman and Saudi Arabia that we support those very virulent elements who seek the demise of their own governments/regimes. 

Saudi Arabia is a dangerous wild card. Trying to play all sides for keeps. Putin, to his credit, didn't sell out. After all, as much as the Saudis claim to despise the Ikhwan al Muslimin, aka Muslim Brothers/MB, they are terrified of them; thus, for decades, they have been financially supporting (especially in the West) MB fronts and organizations to do their dirty work. Why? Because their respective core ideologies are not really indistinguishable and they hoped to keep MB mischief makers from instigating an internal effort to overthrow the House of Saud whom the MB despises as "jahiliyyah." 

Saudi Arabia's balancing act, however, is like a house of cards in the long run. They are only buying time in a rather short sighted manner rather than undertaking a serious --internal--examination of their own domestic situation and their destructive foreign policy approaches which tend to blowback on them.

When Saddam Hussein used mustard and sarin gas against Iranian forces and his own Kurdish populace in Halabja in the 1980s (which BTW killed tens of thousands, not 100s) the West didn't bat an eye. In fact, US support for Saddam bordered on the irrational vis-a-vis US national security interests even after the USS Stark attack in '87. This US approach led to Saddam's Rumaila Oilfield grab, starting with the slant drilling which, rightly, upset and alarmed the Kuwaitis. Bashar Assad, however, doesn't pose such a threat despite his meddling in Lebanon. 

The US has been sucked into the affairs of the Middle East/Muslim world and this has only profited a few special interests at the expense of the American people. Now that our economy is in dire straits, such global misadventures should be curtailed not expanded. 

Monday, August 26, 2013

WASHINGTON: LISTEN TO A SYRIAN KURD LEADER AND STAY OUT OF YET ANOTHER DISASTER

Note: Washington has been taken over by Aliens. Certainly no sane adults around these days. Foreign policy? Doctrine? Take 'em out (which thus begs the question: WHO EXACTLY IS THE ENEMY?) I'd trust the Kurds (Sunni btw) over some of the paid clowns on tv...I think Saleh Muslim hits the nail on the head below (why now? what does Assad have to gain by crossing a widely vocalized "red line" when he is winning?) ...


Syrian Kurdish leader says Assad not to blame for attack


By
 Alexandra Hudson2:10pm EDT

BERLIN (Reuters) - Syrian President Bashar al-Assad would not be "so stupid" as to use chemical weapons close to Damascus, the leader of the country's largest Kurdish group said.
Saleh Muslim, head of the Kurdish Democratic Union Party (PYD), said he doubted the Syrian president would resort to using such weapons when he felt he had the upper hand in the country's civil war.
He suggested last Wednesday's attack...was aimed at framing Assad and provoking an international reeaction. Assad has denied his forces used chemical weapons.

"The regime in Syria ... has chemical weapons, but they wouldn't use them around Damascus, 5 km from the (U.N.) committee which is investigating chemical weapons. Of course they are not so stupid as to do so," Muslim told Reuters.


Muslim suggested "some other sides who want to blame the Syrian regime, who want to show them as guilty and then see action" lay behind the chemical attack, which has led to speculation that Western countries will order a military response.

He said that if the U.N. inspectors found evidence Assad was not behind the gassing and the rebels were, "everybody would forget it".

"Who is the side who would be punished? Are they are going to punish the Emir of Qatar or the King of Saudi Arabia, or Mr. Erdogan of Turkey?" Qatar, Turkey and Saudi Arabia have all strongly condemned Assad and backed the rebels.



Monday, May 20, 2013

ABJECT FAILURE OF AFGHAN GOVT TO PROTECT AFGHAN FEMALES: THE BATTLE IN THE WOLESI JIRGA CIRCA 2013


The "conservatives" (read: Muslim misogynists) in the Afghan parliament succeeded in shelving much needed legislation that --at least on the books-- would serve as a first and essential step towards addressing the pervasive culturally/socially sanctioned violence against the female populace in the name of Islam.

The Law on the Elimination of Violence Against Women, also known as EVAW, which had the approval of President Karzai was withdrawn from debate/passage in Afghanistan's Wolesi Jirga (House of the people).

Opponents to the bill --which would legislatively embed essential protections for Afghan females against being bought and sold, married off as children and ensure certain protections from rampant domestic violence (at least legally)-- trotted out "Islamic Shariah" to bolster their opposition to institutional protections for females.

What is sobering is the fact that certain female members of the parliament joined forces with the mullah/Islamist/"conservatives" to oppose measures that would protect their own sisters/daughters/mothers etc.

Sick and tired of the "un-Islamic" mantra being bandied about to silence opponents of Shariah. How can these "Shariah" proponents justify continued horrors as permissible according to Islamic jurisprudence like the recent news on the brutal/horrific marital rape and murder of an 8 year old by her 50 year old husband (who was also a village mullah) on her wedding night or the stoning to death for alleged infidelity in some village in Kunduz? What kind of "religion" ("of peace") is one talking about??? Are there sane people left in the Muslim dominated regions willing and able to speak out against such brutalities or is the rabies spreading fast?   


The horrific violence against children, females (being burnt alive, acid thrown, noses cut off) and tolerant (read: secularists/religious minorities) citizens in the name of Islam aka the religion of peace is rampant in the Muslim world.

Where is the outrage in these Muslim societies and the equally brutal countermeasures against beasts who understand /appreciate no other language/methods/measures?

To Karzai's credit, he managed to circumvent the "conservative" legislators by passing a presidential decree (the Law on the Elimination of Violence Against Women) in 2009 which criminalized child marriage, forced prostitution, rape, forced self-immolation and any other violent behavior which specifically targeted females. But he has no traction (or does he??) with the "conservative" elements in Parliament to ensure this becomes law.



Brave activists like Fawzia Koofi, head of the women's affairs committee of the upper house of parliament, the Wolesi Jirga, and a strong supporter of EVAW met their match in the thuggish opposition disguised as "pious religious entities" who sought to ensure compliance with Shariah: namely the mullahs and warlords who managed to wrestle their way into the parliament a long time ago.

With the NATO withdrawal looming, proponents of such measures have good reason to worry. What is tragic is that after billions of dollars spent to win "hearts and minds" and help the Afghan populace counter the terrorists (read: Muslim extremists), what a NATO "victory" will look like in due course will be hard for most Westerners to fathom.

The window of opportunity closed a long time ago because of a myriad of factors and missed breaks at the very beginning.


Alas, the writing is on the wall. There is only one way to deal with this growing scourge and it is not a palatable one for most civilized people. Yet.

http://www.thefrontierpost.com/article/13707/

http://www.tolonews.com/en/afghanistan/10536-law-on-elimination-of-violence-against-women-dropped-by-parliament

http://kabulpress.org/my/spip.php?article88802




Monday, May 13, 2013

VICTOR DAVIS HANSON'S SAGE ADVICE/CASE FOR NON-INTERVENTION IN THE VIOLENT SYRIAN QUAGMIRE IN PJ MEDIA



Count Me Out on Syria
Posted By Victor Davis Hanson On May 13, 2013 @ 9:44 am  

Some excerpts from Hanson’s excellent analysis of the current violent Syrian quagmire. For the entire article, here’s the link

There are good reasons to go into Syria, but far better ones to stay out.

Let us review a few of them. Syria is a humanitarian crisis with over one million refugees and 70,000 dead.

But there are similar outrages in Mali, Somalia, and the Sudan. Why no calls to go there as well? Would U.S. troops, planes, or massive shipments of weapons stop the killing, or simply ensure endless cycles of death following the Assad departure

Will Syria’s Christians and other minorities become worse off with or without Assad?

More importantly, we do not at this late stage know which terrorist is a pro-Western Google-type, and which is a hard-core jihadist. 

The history of the Middle East in particular (see Iran in 1980) and world history in general (cf. France, 1794 or Russia, 1917) suggests that the more extreme, better organized revolutionary zealots, even when in the minority, usually win out over the moderate and sensible reformers in the post-war sorting out and sizing up. 

There are not many Washingtons, Jeffersons, or Madisons in the annals of revolutionary history.

When Assad goes, the postbellum mess will either go straight to the sham election of a Mohammed Morsi type, who will try to suspend the very constitution that brought him to power, or we will witness round two of Libyan-type violence. 


Of course, there are also strategic reasons for toppling Assad. How wonderful to see Hezbollah lose their Iranian-arms conduit, or to remove Syria from the Iran-Hezbollah axis. But is that not happening now anyway?


Well apart from Benghazi, Susan Rice and Samantha Power’s Libya is a blueprint for nothing. 

This time around we will not get UN approval after assuring Russia and China last time that our “humanitarian aid” and “no-fly zones” did not entail ground support, which of course it immediately did. 


If in 2002 Iraq was to be a “cakewalk,” by 2004 it was “Bush’s war.” To name just a few across the political spectrum in random order, I’m sure that a Francis Fukuyama, Fareed Zakaria, Andrew Sullivan, George Will, the late William F. Buckley, Jr., Thomas Friedman, John Kerry, and thousands of others all had legitimate reasons in abandoning the cause of Iraq. 

Lord knows it was unwise to let thousands of scattered Ba’athist soldiers roam the streets of Iraq unemployed. How stupid was it to focus only on WMD when the Congress gave lots of reasons to remove Saddam? 

The list of screw-ups goes on and on. But the fact remains that victory in war goes not to those who make no mistakes, but to those who learn the most quickly from them in order to ensure the fewest in the future.

Please, Spare Us Now “You Owe Us Help”
If Arab reformers ever wanted a shot at democracy, Iraq was still their golden opportunity. Instead, almost all damned the effort and caricatured Americans. I once in 2006 sat in a clinic in Tripoli listening to Arab intellectuals (or rather Gaddafi minders) explain to me the Jewish roots of the Iraqi war, and how Americans were siphoning oil off in the desert and flying it in tankers home. 

Finally, I could not even follow all the conspiracy theories concocted to explain how wicked the Maliki government was.

Please, spare us now “you owe us your help.” 

We have been there, done that, and we have learned some great lessons about the 21st century, pre-modern Middle East, and any interventions into it: a) Arab reformers damn the U.S. for doing nothing, but they will damn it far more for doing something; b) interventionists believe that all success is their offspring, and failure is outsourced to someone else, usually the military or those who sent the military in; c) the Middle East lesson of Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya is that only a huge U.S. ground presence, in the fashion of postwar Italy, Germany, or Japan, coupled with abject defeat of the enemy, can lead to any chance of consensual government.

Without bloody fighting and without massive U.S. aid either the enemy wins and takes over, or what replaces the enemy reverts to the mindset of the enemy.

There is irony in seeing the opportunistic war critic Barack Obama out-drone Bush or be attacked on his Left by liberals, who rail at his callousness in not intervening in Syria. 

But there is not enough irony for schadenfreude — given that American soldiers might be sent into a theater by those who would support them only to the degree that they were deemed successful and blame their setbacks on everyone but themselves.

A nearly bankrupt and divided America after Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya is not up for Syria — and an Arab Spring that on its own chose Winter does not deserve any more American blood.
Sorry, that’s just the way it is.


Article printed from Works and Days: http://pjmedia.com/victordavishanson
URL to article: http://pjmedia.com/victordavishanson/count-me-out-on-syria/

Friday, March 22, 2013

KING ABDULLAH OF JORDAN WARNS THE WORLD ABOUT THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD THREAT

When King Abdullah of the Hashemites publicly warns the world about the threat from "Islamists," it would be prudent to pay heed and take action. Is the media going to call the direct descendant of the Prophet Muhammad an "Islamophobe" now? Do they dare? Will CAIR care? What about the Obama Administration?

It takes such a leader to speak the truth. He has Morsi, Erdogan and their ilks' number. King Abdullah doesn't want his world moving towards darkness led by the intolerant orthodoxy that will bring global ruin. Judging from his speeches, he wants progress and enlightenment for all. To expand access to better opportunities for his people in a meritocracy.

Abdullah is correct: Erdogan is far more dangerous (and cunning) than Morsi. But Erdogan, despite his self importance, has no traction with the Arab street. Ethnic politics in the Middle East is alive and well....regardless of the non-stop "Umma" narrative emanating from the mosques of Europe and North America where the perception is "there is power in numbers"...for now.

Where one can disagree with King Abdullah's analysis is with his description of the Muslim Brotherhood as a "Masonic cult." Lexicon matters. Linking the Free Masons with the MB is not only insulting (to the Masons); it is inaccurate and it feeds the conspiracy theory mill.

The Free Masons (George Washington comes to mind) speak of man as "the offspring of a Universal father" and espouse a sort of "live and let live" construct. While the MB --who aligned themselves early on with the Nazis-- have been one version of contemporary "Islamofascism" which seeks to destroy all who don't subscribe to their draconian notions and ways.

SOME RECENT ARTICLES:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323829504578267951332697058.html

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2013/04/monarch-in-the-middle/309270/

http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/politics/2012/12/jordanian-king-looks-left-to-counter-islamists.html

Thursday, March 14, 2013

Muslim Brotherhood Condemns UN Efforts To Combat Violence Against Women

This comes as a bit of a surprise for two reasons:
1)The MB under President Morsi hasn't completed consolidation of their hold on power (although up to 70% of Egyptians want Shariah law as the antidote to autocratic rule);
2)They are spitting into the hand that literally feeds them (the US and the West).

This public stance suggests a degree of regime confidence that gives room for pause. Why are they so "confident" to publicly denounce a UN measure which has widespread global support? Even in Muslim majority states, the secularists support and continue the fight against the religious elements to bring about legislative measures which address the widespread mistreatment and abuse of their female populace. 

One needs to consider what kind of hold/influence does the MB have over our own government that gives this elected regime the kind of policy wiggle room which allows it to publicly condemn efforts led by the UN that the overwhelming majority of American tax payers support/relate to. Why are we supporting this misogynistic and violent regime?

Heil Ikhwan al Muslimin!


Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood Condemns UN Report on Women

By Nadine Marroushi on March 14, 2013
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2013-03-14/egypt-s-muslim-brotherhood-condemns-un-report-on-women


Excerpts from the article:


Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood, the country’s largest Islamist movement, criticized a United Nations report that aimed to end violence against women and girls, saying it violates principles of Islamic law.
The Brotherhood, the movement from which Egypt’s President Mohamed Mursi hails, sent a 10-point critique of a document drafted at a meeting of the UN Commission on the Status of Women in New York. The text is due to be formally adopted when the session ends tomorrow.
“The Muslim Brotherhood calls on leaders of Islamic countries, their foreign ministers and representatives in the United Nations to reject and condemn this document,” the group said statement. It urged the UN “to rise up to the high morals and principles of family relations prescribed by Islam.”
The growing power of the Brotherhood since the overthrow of Hosni Mubarak in 2011 has raised concerns Egypt may adopt religiously motivated laws that would curtail freedoms, especially for women and Christians. Persistent protests against Mursi and the Brotherhood have frequently erupted into violence, eroding political stability and hopes of reviving an economy suffering from the flight of tourists and investors.
The primary theme of the commission’s 57th session was the “elimination and prevention of all forms of violence against women and girls.”
The Brotherhood described the theme of the conference as “deceptive,” saying it violated Islamic principles. The UN document seeks to destroy the family institution, which Egypt’s constitution confirmed as the basis of society, the group said.
Among the 10 points the Brotherhood said it opposed were resolutions to ensure women’s rights to complain of marital rape; promote equal inheritance rights and equal rights between men and women within the family; and allow Muslim women to marry non-Muslims. It also criticized recommendations to abolish the need for male permission for travel, work or use contraception.






Monday, February 11, 2013

Pakistan Army Atrocities in Bangladesh (formerly East Pakistan)

Guilty Verdict of Bangladesh War Crimes Tribunal on 1971 Atrocities

by Salim Mansur
CIP
February 11, 2013

Some excerpts below:
The Bangladesh International Crimes Tribunal has announced one of the first major judgments at trial of individuals alleged to have committed war crimes in 1971, when the Pakistan Army waged a near-genocidal war in the former East Pakistan. As the judges note in this document, some three million people were killed, some quarter million women were raped, and an estimated ten million people became refugees in neighbouring India.

It is also history-making for it brings Muslim perpetrators to answer for their crimes against humanity, for their murder, rape and pillage of innocent people, a majority of whom were Muslims, and then for the indiscriminate hate-filled violence against Hindus and other non-Muslims that I personally witnessed as our own family gardener, a Hindu, was executed in our home for simply being a Hindu, by soldiers of the Pakistan Army who raided our property.

It is important to note that the OIC – the Organization of Islamic Cooperation – has not stepped forth to support the landmark effort of the Bangladesh War Crimes Tribunal in bringing individuals to indictment for war crimes committed in 1971.

On the contrary, the President of Turkey, Abdullah Gül, is on record a having written to the President of Bangladesh an improper letter in flagrant violation of diplomatic protocol or respect for the independence of the Tribunal in a sovereign country, asking for suspension of the Tribunal with forgiveness for those accused of war crimes.

Anyone in the West seriously concerned for human rights, due process, rule of law, individual rights and freedoms, misogyny and violence against women, and democracy, should support the efforts of Bangladesh as a poor Muslim-majority country setting a precedent among OIC states of bringing war criminals, almost without exception Muslims, and many if not most of the indicted still alive and living in Pakistan or in many instances in the West, to justice.